Cue Queen Bey, because pro women’s hockey’s experiencing a renaissance right now, and North America’s top talent has mostly filtered through the NCAA.

A new device has the potential to change the landscape of concussion prevention, and it’s being showcased by women on one of the world's biggest stages — the 2023 WWC.

We’ve covered the pay gap and the difference in media rights and sponsorship deals for men’s and women’s soccer, but how different is fan interest in men’s World Cups (WCs) and WWCs?

With the majority of Group A’s games complete, two curious storylines are popping up: World No. 12 and group-favorite Norway can’t find their footing, while No. 46 Philippines — a first-time WWCer — appear poised to shock the world.

Fresh powder’s still months away, but there’s no better time to, ahem, peak into NCAA skiing.

Two key storylines are emerging after a thrilling opening WWC weekend.

Forbes recently released its list of the top paid athletes in this year’s WWC, ranging from $1.1M to $7.1M throughout the top 15.

The WWC is off to a ravishing start with upsets, injuries, and history-making goals defining the first two matchdays Down Under.

Democratic senators Richard Blumenthal and Cory Booker and Republican senator Jerry Moran released an early draft of the College Athletes Protection and Compensation Act yesterday.

So, settle in for eight days of climbs, sprints, and races as today’s Scroll breaks down everything from the race’s history to the iconic yellow jersey.

We couldn’t agree more, so here’s a closer look at the numbers that are already proving them right.